Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)

What is Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)?

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is a preference-based fine-tuning technique that aligns a model using paired comparisons between responses, rather than relying on reinforcement learning or reward models. For each input prompt, DPO uses a chosen response (preferred) and a rejected response (less preferred) to directly increase the likelihood of generating the chosen output while decreasing the likelihood of the rejected one. This is achieved through a closed-form optimization objective that simplifies training while still capturing preference signals effectively. DPO is particularly useful when you have datasets that express relative human preferences, and it typically produces stable, efficient, and preference-aligned model behaviors.

Prerequisites

Before installing, make sure you have:

  1. Pip or

  2. gcloud CLI - required because gllm-training is a private library hosted in a private Google Cloud repository

After installing, please run

gcloud auth login

to authorize gcloud to access the Cloud Platform with Google user credentials.

Our internal gllm-training package is hosted in a secure Google Cloud Artifact Registry. You need to authenticate via gcloud CLI to access and download the package during installation.

  1. The minimum requirements:

    1. CUDA-compatible GPU

    2. Recommendation GPU:

      1. RTX A5000

      2. RTX 40/50 series.

    3. Windows/Linux, currently not support for macOS

Installation

pip install --extra-index-url "https://oauth2accesstoken:$(gcloud auth print-access-token)@glsdk.gdplabs.id/gen-ai-internal/simple/" "gllm-training"

Quickstart

Let's move on to a basic example fine-tuned using DPOTrainer. To run DPO fine-tuning, you need to specify a model name, dpo_column_mapping and dataset path. Make sure your data sets contained of prompt, chosen as a correct response and rejected as a rejected response.

# Main Code
from gllm_training import DPOTrainer

dpo_trainer = DPOTrainer(
    model_name="Qwen/Qwen3-0.6b",
    datasets_path="examples/dpo_csv"
)
dpo_trainer.train()

Fine tuning model using YAML file.

We can run experiments in a more structured way by using a YAML file. The current DPO fine-tuning SDK supports both online data from Google Spreadsheets and local data in CSV format.

Example 1: Fine tuning using online data.

We can prepared our experiment using YAML file with the data trained and validation from google spreadsheet.

1

Configure environment variables (.env)

Fill in the GOOGLE_SHEETS_CLIENT_EMAIL and GOOGLE_SHEETS_PRIVATE_KEY fields. If you don’t have these keys, please contact the infrastructure team.

2

Share the spreadsheet

Share your Google Spreadsheet containing the training and validation data with the GOOGLE_SHEETS_CLIENT_EMAIL.

3

Experiment configuration (dpo_experiment_config.yml)

You can use a YAML file to plan your fine tuning experiments. To fine tuning with YAML, you need to define the required variables in the file.

4

Fine tuning

To run your fine-tuning, you need to load the YAML data using the YamlConfigLoader function, and select the experiment ID when executing the load function.

Example 2: Fine tuning using local data.

The remaining hyperparameter configurations for fine-tuning are the same as when using online data. Below is an example YAML configuration for using local data for training and validation.

Logging Monitoring

During the DPO fine-tuning process, the SDK automatically generates comprehensive logs to help you monitor training progress and debug issues. These logs are stored in two formats:

JSONL Logs (Structured Training Metrics)

The SDK generates structured JSONL logs that capture detailed training metrics at each step. These logs are stored in:

Example path: data/dpo/model/exp_1/Qwen3-0.6b/logs/dpo_train_steps.jsonl

Each line in the JSONL file contains a JSON object with training metrics such as:

  • step: Training step number

  • loss: DPO training loss at that step

  • learning_rate: Current learning rate

  • epoch: Current epoch number

  • rewards/chosen: Implicit rewards for chosen (preferred) responses

  • rewards/rejected: Implicit rewards for rejected (less preferred) responses

  • rewards/margins: Margin between chosen and rejected rewards

  • logps/chosen: Log probabilities of chosen responses

  • logps/rejected: Log probabilities of rejected responses

  • And other relevant metrics

You can parse these logs programmatically or use tools like jq to analyze the training progression:

Note: The JSONL file contains training metrics including preference margins between chosen and rejected responses. Use select() to filter for the specific type of data you need. The rewards/accuracies metric shows how often the model correctly predicts which response is preferred.

TensorBoard Logs (Visual Monitoring)

For visual monitoring and analysis, the SDK also generates TensorBoard-compatible logs stored in:

Example path: data/dpo/model/exp_999/Qwen3-0.6b/logs_tensorboard

To visualize your training progress:

  1. Launch TensorBoard:

  1. Open your browser and navigate to http://localhost:6006

  2. Monitor key metrics:

    • Training loss curves

    • Reward margins (chosen vs rejected)

    • Implicit reward trends

    • Learning rate scheduling

    • Log probability distributions

    • Step-by-step progress

    • Epoch progression

Log Configuration

You can customize logging behavior through the hyperparameters configuration:

Best Practices

  1. Monitor reward margins: Check that the margin between chosen and rejected rewards increases over time - if margins stay flat or decrease, the model isn't learning to distinguish between preferred and non-preferred responses

  2. Track loss patterns: Use TensorBoard to see DPO loss trends - the loss should decrease steadily; sudden spikes may indicate learning rate issues or data quality problems with chosen/rejected pairs

  3. Debug preference learning: JSONL logs show reward statistics for each step - look for positive margins (chosen rewards higher than rejected), check if margins are too small (weak preferences), or if they fluctuate wildly (inconsistent data)

  4. Monitor implicit rewards: Both chosen and rejected rewards should be reasonable - if rejected rewards are too high or chosen rewards are too low, your preference data may have labeling issues

  5. Compare experiments: Save logs from each experiment to compare which hyperparameters and preference datasets produce the best alignment - use Tensorboard to view multiple experiments side-by-side

Upload model to cloud storage

When running experiments, we don’t always save the model directly to the cloud. Instead, we may first evaluate its performance before uploading it to cloud storage. To support this workflow, we provide a save_model function that allows you to upload the model as a separate step after fine tuning.

1

Configure environment variable (.env)

Fill in the AWS_ACCESS_KEY, AWS_SECRET_KEY and AWS_REGION fields. If you don’t have these keys, please contact the infrastructure team.

2

Upload model

To upload the model, you need to configure the storage configuration and specify the model path on save_model function. The model path should point to the directory of your best adapter model.

Last updated